QUICK TIPS FOR HAULING GAME MEAT HOME

0
176

The trickle of blood running down my cheek provided enough sensation to rocket me out of sleep and back into reality. It was our fifth day hunting elk in my home state of New Mexico. The temps were averaging in the mid 90’s, and this area hadn’t seen rain in weeks, pretty unusual for the Chihuahuan Desert during monsoon season. The heat and dry environment had proved too much for my sinuses and the inevitable bloody nose was the result.

Later that day my wife would kill her first elk, a dandy 6-point bull, taken with her bow at 20 yards. We finished the pack out on day six and the struggle to salvage the maximum amount of meat in the summer heat had begun. Seven days prior, I had filled two large Yeti ice chests with milk jugs of frozen water. Once the jugs were in the chests, I filled in the gaps with loose ice cubes to ensure the ice chests were as full as possible but not too full to properly seal. When we set up camp, I tucked the ice chests in the shade and hoped for the best.

During the hunt, I resisted the urge to check the ice level in fear that I would accelerate the melting process. Once we arrived back at camp with the bull, I hung the game bags under a large ponderosa and finally cracked the ice chests open. As expected, the ice had barely melted! I cooled the meat in the shade, processed it into more manageable pieces and split it between the two ice chests evenly. Two days later the bull was dropped off at the processor with very minimal meat loss.

See also  .22-250 Remington vs .243 Winchester Ammo Comparison - Ballistics Info & Chart Caliber Ballistics Comparison 07 Dec, 2018 Posted By: Foundry Outdoors The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .22-250 Remington vs .243 Winchester ammo rounds. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. As such, the following is for comparative information purposes only and should not be used to make precise predictions of the trajectory, performance, or true ballistics of any particular .22-250 Remington or .243 Winchester rounds for hunting, target shooting, plinking, or any other usage. The decision for which round is better for a given application should be made with complete information, and this article simply serves as a comparative guide, not the final say. For more detailed ballistics information please refer to the exact round in question or contact the manufacturer for the pertinent information. True .22-250 Remington and .243 Winchester ballistics information can vary widely from the displayed information, and it is important to understand that the particular characteristics of a given round can make a substantive difference in its true performance. Caliber Type Velocity (fps) Energy (ft-lb) .22-250 Remington Rifle 3790 1620 .243 Winchester Rifle 3180 1950 [Click Here to Shop .22-250 Remington Ammo] [Click Here to Shop .243 Winchester Ammo] VelocityAs illustrated in the chart, .22-250 Remington rounds - on average - achieve a velocity of about 3790 feet per second (fps) while .243 Winchester rounds travel at a velocity of 3180 fps. To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at a cruising speed of 600 mph, or 880 fps. That is to say, .22-250 Remington bullets travel 4.3 times the speed of a 737 airplane at cruising speed, while .243 Winchester bullets travel 3.6 times that same speed.Various calibersEnergyFurthermore, the muzzle energy of a .22-250 Remington round averages out to 1620 ft-lb, while a .243 Winchester round averages out to about 1950 ft-lb. One way to think about this is as such: a foot-pound is a unit of energy equal to the amount of energy required to raise a weight of one pound a distance of one foot. So a .22-250 Remington round exits the barrel with kinetic energy equal to the energy required for linear vertical displacement of 1620 pounds through a one foot distance, while a .243 Winchester round exiting the barrel has energy equal to the amount required to displace 1950 pounds over the same one foot distance. As a rule of thumb, when it comes to hunting, muzzle energy is what many hunters look at when deciding on what caliber of firearm / ammunition to select. Generally speaking, the higher the muzzle energy, the higher the stopping power. Again, the above is for comparative information purposes only, and you should consult the exact ballistics for the particular .22-250 Remington or .243 Winchester cartridge you're looking at purchasing. [Buy .22-250 Remington Ammo] [Buy .243 Winchester Ammo] Please click the above links to take a look at all of the .22-250 Remington and .243 Winchester ammo we have in stock and ready to ship, and let us know any parting thoughts in the comment section below.Foundry Outdoors is your trusted home for buying archery, camping, fishing, hunting, shooting sports, and outdoor gear online.We offer cheap ammo and bulk ammo deals on the most popular ammo calibers. We have a variety of deals on Rifle Ammo, Handgun Ammo, Shotgun Ammo & Rimfire Ammo, as well as ammo for target practice, plinking, hunting, or shooting competitions. Our website lists special deals on 9mm Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 45-70 Ammo, 6.5 Creedmoor ammo, 300 Blackout Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 5.56 Ammo, Underwood Ammo, Buffalo Bore Ammo and more special deals on bulk ammo.We offer a 100% Authenticity Guarantee on all products sold on our website. Please email us if you have questions about any of our product listings. 6 Comments Justin - May 08, 2020You guys are full of crap. This is misleading Bologna, you know the 45 -70 grain .243 Win destroy the 22 250 in velocity and distance. The range of the 243 also defiles the 22-250 . I wish I could sue you for misleading crap like this. Tyson - May 09, 2020@Justin – i think they are right, what is your source? everything I’m seeing agrees with the above info 22-250 is faster, 243 has more energy. compare PP22250 vs PP2432 for examplePP22250 – 1655 ft lbs, 3680 fps PP243 – 1945 ft lbs, 2960 fps Paul Nelson - Dec 06, 2021Tyson is correct. I shoot a Tikka T3 22-250. Although I load my own for long distance shooting, I trade kinetic energy, stopping power for muzzle velocity. I would not shoot a large game animal at the distance I shoot, although my round is very fast and accurate beyond belief, at distance beyond 500 yards my 85 gr.Nosler round lacks the punch to pierce beyond the shoulder blade. The rounds small weight and lose of it’s kenetic energy just doesn’t hold together upon bone contact. Soft targets see the perform at it best. Paul Nelson - Dec 06, 2021Justin, meant no disrespect. For anyone who takes thier shooting very personal, I have the ultimate book for you. It’s called, Game loads and practical ballistics for the American hunter. Covers all basic civilian calibers from .17 varsity to .375 H&H. Cover drop at 100 yard intervals, temperature effect on performance, which powders and primers are best for your caliber and more. Took the author 25 yrs to compile the data. Excellent book for any shooters library. The author is Bob Hagel, writer for many outdoors and firearm publications. Also gives you creditable facts when challenged by another shooter. Bradley - Nov 16, 2022@Paul Nelson What’s the barrel twist rate in your Tikka T3 22-250? I’ve been checking some ballistic value data and the info would suggest that a long bullet like the 85 gr Nosler you use would require 1:9 or faster. But the experiment always outweighs the theory! That’s why I’m looking at a Browning X-Bolt with 22 in barrel and 1:9 twist rate. It’s possibly on the high side for smaller and lighter projectiles but perfect for the longer heavier ones. Greg - May 23, 2024I agree with the first guy to comment…while if what you shoot is what you can find at the store, yeah, the 22-250 is way faster….If you handload….well, my 243 will be right with the 250 in terms of velocity with a bigger heavier bullet. Want a good comparison, 22-250 with a 40 gr. Around 4000-4100, 243 with a 55-58gr at around 3900-4000. 22-250 with a 55gr at around 3600-3700 vs my go to varmint load in my 243 with a 70 gr at a little under 3600. Yeah, the 243 wins Leave a commentComments have to be approved before showing up Your Name * Your Email * Your Comment * Post Comment

It can be intimidating to come out west, hunt a new state and species, and make it home with the maximum amount of meat after a successful hunt. Below is a list of suggestions to help transport your hard-earned bounty home.

Save your jugs.

I’ve made it a habit to save my milk jugs. As I consume meat from the prior year, I fill the jugs with water and use them to fill the space in the chest freezer. They will last much longer than ice cubes when out in the field.

Ensure you have space.

A bull elk is larger than you think. They will definitely fill two, large 120-quart ice chests when you have the appropriate amount of ice. If you’re hunting a medium-sized animal (deer/sheep), a large ice chest will hold you over. Place the meat inside, and keep it topped off with the maximum amount of ice.

Sun is bad.

Sounds simple, right? But I’ve seen several instances where someone forgot to put the cooler back in the shade, and they accelerated the melting process dramatically. Keep it in the shade, especially if you’ve already filled it with meat. If you have it in the bed of your truck while you’re driving back home, cover it with a blanket or sleeping bag to better insulate it.

Don’t stress.

I regularly keep meat on ice for 7 to 10 days before I get the chance to freeze it or process it. Drain the bloody water and keep replacing the ice during your travels, and you’ll be fine. You can even fly home with a cooler or two full of meat. You’ll need to pay attention to weight limits and will most likely be charged for the extra checked baggage. But it’s a great way to get your hard-earned protein back from an adventure.

See also  How to Find Arrowheads in Creek Beds:

Lastly, if you have the chance to freeze it, do it.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard someone say you can’t defrost meat then re-freeze it. Nonsense. Cut the meat into manageable pieces, freeze it and you’ll have absolutely no problem transporting it. Defrost it when you’re ready, or drop it off at the processor frozen. I have even seen guys who drive out to their hunts, pull a small trailer with their gear, ATV, generator and a small chest freezer and actually freeze their own meat in the field for the long ride home. Once their hunt is done, they load everything up, duct tape the freezer closed and they’re good to go.

It can be difficult to find success on a western hunt, not to mention getting the meat back home. But follow these useful tips, and you’ll increase your chances of bringing home the maximum amount of meat with the least amount of spoilage.

Flying Home?

If you’re traveling by plane to hunt, consider skipping the return flight home if the hunt was successful. You’ll have the added cost of renting a vehicle, buying a cooler and ice for the return trip. Still, in spite of these expenses, it comes out much cheaper than paying to have the meat shipped which, for elk, can run upwards of $1,000.

QUICK TIPS FOR HAULING GAME MEAT HOME

Article Photos: Garrett Drach

Previous articleFish and Chips: Critical Temps for Flaky Fish
Next articleGain the Edge with the Best 3D Leafy Camo for Hunting
Ethan Smith is a seasoned marine veteran, professional blogger, witty and edgy writer, and an avid hunter. He spent a great deal of his childhood years around the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. Watching active hunters practise their craft initiated him into the world of hunting and rubrics of outdoor life. He also honed his writing skills by sharing his outdoor experiences with fellow schoolmates through their high school’s magazine. Further along the way, the US Marine Corps got wind of his excellent combination of skills and sought to put them into good use by employing him as a combat correspondent. He now shares his income from this prestigious job with his wife and one kid. Read more >>