Knives for self defense

0
214
Video is a knife good for self defense
2021 09 15 Knives for self defense

Knives are a popular suggestion for women’s self defense. They are often recommended because they’re relatively small and light, easy to carry, and apparently simple to use. A girl with a pocket knife doesn’t raise any eyebrows and it’s the rare woman who hasn’t felt safer at some point in her life because she had a knife in her purse or waistband. Because of that, I often get asked what suggestions I might have in the realm of bladed weapons. It’s a topic I’ve been avoiding for months at least, in fact, though, and here’s why:

They’re an incredibly complex answer to the problem of outfitting a woman to defend herself. While there are some specific and important upsides to carrying a blade, there are also some significant downsides. I want to start with the latter because until you can get past them, the rest is merely theoretical.

First, there’s the often-ignored fact that knives constitute lethal force. Even if you only mean to threaten an attacker by waving a knife, or you think that your little pen knife can’t do real harm, knives by definition can kill someone when you stab and cut someone with them. Like drawing a gun, holding a knife threatens death to the person you are facing. From a legal perspective, you can get in a whole lot of trouble using lethal force when you aren’t yourself reasonably threatened with death, rape, or other great bodily harm. It’s a nuanced topic but suffice it to say that you might not be able to bat your eyes and get away with having or using a legally inappropriate self defense tool. Perhaps more importantly, if you end up using that knife to defend yourself, you might kill somebody. No matter how much harm that person intended or did to you, you still might not be okay with that end. Whether you are or aren’t, you should figure it out before you commit yourself to a tool that can lead you there.

See also  .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester Ammo Comparison - Ballistics Info & Chart Caliber Ballistics Comparison 07 Dec, 2018 Posted By: Foundry Outdoors The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester ammo rounds. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. As such, the following is for comparative information purposes only and should not be used to make precise predictions of the trajectory, performance, or true ballistics of any particular .223 Remington or .243 Winchester rounds for hunting, target shooting, plinking, or any other usage. The decision for which round is better for a given application should be made with complete information, and this article simply serves as a comparative guide, not the final say. For more detailed ballistics information please refer to the exact round in question or contact the manufacturer for the pertinent information. True .223 Remington and .243 Winchester ballistics information can vary widely from the displayed information, and it is important to understand that the particular characteristics of a given round can make a substantive difference in its true performance. Caliber Type Velocity (fps) Energy (ft-lb) .223 Remington Rifle 3150 1250 .243 Winchester Rifle 3180 1950 [Click Here to Shop .223 Remington Ammo] [Click Here to Shop .243 Winchester Ammo] VelocityAs illustrated in the chart, .223 Remington rounds - on average - achieve a velocity of about 3150 feet per second (fps) while .243 Winchester rounds travel at a velocity of 3180 fps. To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at a cruising speed of 600 mph, or 880 fps. That is to say, .223 Remington bullets travel 3.6 times the speed of a 737 airplane at cruising speed, while .243 Winchester bullets travel 3.6 times that same speed.Various calibersEnergyFurthermore, the muzzle energy of a .223 Remington round averages out to 1250 ft-lb, while a .243 Winchester round averages out to about 1950 ft-lb. One way to think about this is as such: a foot-pound is a unit of energy equal to the amount of energy required to raise a weight of one pound a distance of one foot. So a .223 Remington round exits the barrel with kinetic energy equal to the energy required for linear vertical displacement of 1250 pounds through a one foot distance, while a .243 Winchester round exiting the barrel has energy equal to the amount required to displace 1950 pounds over the same one foot distance. As a rule of thumb, when it comes to hunting, muzzle energy is what many hunters look at when deciding on what caliber of firearm / ammunition to select. Generally speaking, the higher the muzzle energy, the higher the stopping power. Again, the above is for comparative information purposes only, and you should consult the exact ballistics for the particular .223 Remington or .243 Winchester cartridge you're looking at purchasing. [Buy .223 Remington Ammo] [Buy .243 Winchester Ammo] Please click the above links to take a look at all of the .223 Remington and .243 Winchester ammo we have in stock and ready to ship, and let us know any parting thoughts in the comment section below.Foundry Outdoors is your trusted home for buying archery, camping, fishing, hunting, shooting sports, and outdoor gear online.We offer cheap ammo and bulk ammo deals on the most popular ammo calibers. We have a variety of deals on Rifle Ammo, Handgun Ammo, Shotgun Ammo & Rimfire Ammo, as well as ammo for target practice, plinking, hunting, or shooting competitions. Our website lists special deals on 9mm Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 45-70 Ammo, 6.5 Creedmoor ammo, 300 Blackout Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 5.56 Ammo, Underwood Ammo, Buffalo Bore Ammo and more special deals on bulk ammo.We offer a 100% Authenticity Guarantee on all products sold on our website. Please email us if you have questions about any of our product listings. 7 Comments kenneth ellsworth - Oct 20, 2019The 223 is not legal for hunting in many states. Such as my state of Washington requires .24 caliber/6mm minimum. Make no mistake the 223 will DRT any deer with proper shot placement and shot placement above all things takes game Joshua - May 16, 2020what i find funny is a 22 cal. Can kill a deer on the spot but you cant hunt with them. V - Aug 15, 2020I like that .223 is not as overbore as .243. I like that .243 has substantially more ft. lbs of energy. I guess I’ll just have to own both. As if that’s such a painstaking decision. You didn’t have to pull my arm out of it’s socket for that solution. 😂 B - Apr 03, 2021The .243 has more terminal energy at 300 yards than the .223 does at the muzzle. Most people when they first get into guns are drawn to the AR-15 and standard .223 rounds, but later we all realize that the .223 doesn’t reliably drop deer or humans without 2 or 3 hits. The .243 is one-shot, one-kill at normal ranges and the .223 simply cannot be relied upon as such. It is underpowered on anything heavier than a coyote. Carson Mineer - Oct 19, 2021I’m no expert .wasn’t the ,223 designed to wound not kill in theory removing three soldiers from the battlefield wayne allan - Nov 23, 2021I read mystery novels and wondered why a sniper would use a .223 in a favorite author of mine. I target shoot a Glock 44, I enjoy the fun of getting better. My question, do you have 22lr available for sale? Please let me know, thanks Wayne Geoff Barnes - Nov 16, 2022In Australia we don’t have any big game except for some water buffalo and crocodiles up north with the crocs being protected so they can eat humans! A .303 was used to hunt crocs back in the day. The 223 and 243 are used extensively to control kangaroos which are often in plague proportions and destroy wheat crops. Naturally the 243 hits a bit harder but the 223 is just as effective on roos. Leave a commentComments have to be approved before showing up Your Name * Your Email * Your Comment * Post Comment

Then, too, is the fact that actually using a knife against another human being is a terrifyingly intimate form of violence. In order to stop someone by stabbing or cutting them, you will need to get up close and personal to make a lot of holes and let loose a lot of blood. Forget about how a dozen or more slashes or stab wounds might play to the news or a jury, you need to consider for yourself whether you can actually do that to someone. Even a strong sense of survival and willingness to fight for your life might not overcome the, frankly, squickiness of the feelings, sights, and sounds of using a knife in a desperate me-or-them struggle. You don’t want to find out you aren’t okay with that in that tiny moment after the first time you slide a blade into flesh and before the second time you must.

If, perhaps when, you can get over those mental hurdles, there are practical concerns as well. Unlike pepper spray, one can’t generally walk around with a knife ready to go in your hand. Instead, it’s the kind of tool that you normally have to grab as or after the attack begins. Accessing weapons inside of a fight can be an incredibly difficult problem to solve and requires some real skills to go with the determination to use anything you can to win your life. Without them, a knife shoved into a pocket or a purse, or even clipped to a waistband, might as well be as far away as the moon. It’s even harder if the choice is some sort of folding knife, which must also be opened – often requiring two hands in practice even if not in theory, and with a locking mechanism that might not be reliable against hard clothing barriers or bone. Either way, once you are able to deploy a knife, hanging on to it without dropping it or hurting yourself can be more challenging than it seems at first impression.

See also  Restoring Your Dutch Oven

All that and blades are not very good at physiologically stopping determined attackers. Stab wounds and cuts are not always noticed or cared about, and they often don’t cause enough damage to make someone stop moving or living quickly enough to keep the defender safe from further injury from the bad guy. The idea of anatomical cuts that can disable a limb is attractive, but nearly impossible to effectively perform against someone who is actively moving around and who doesn’t want to be hurt. If relying on blood loss instead, it takes an awful long time for a human body to bleed out enough to stop functioning. Knives may be better than nothing, or better than some alternate choices, but that doesn’t necessarily make them a good choice for a particular person or in a particular setting.

Don’t get me wrong: I like the idea of knives for self defense and I carry them myself. The ones you see here are out of my personal collection. They may not be easy to get to in a fight, but they can be easier to get to than the alternative lethal force choice of a gun. They’re more comfortable to carry and simpler to conceal than, again, guns. Legality of possessing a knife intended for defensive use or that could be pressed into defensive use can be complicated, but often less difficult to navigate than other options. While expensive ones can certainly be had, knives that are well-suited for self defense can be had at reasonable prices that make using and losing them a surmountable cost for many people. Plus you can find ones that are pretty or cool-looking, whatever that means to you.

See also  Are sunflower seeds good for turkeys?

But they are neither a simple nor an easy solution that will automatically make you safer, and certainly not by simply having one with you. They can be difficult to deploy into a fight and to use in the midst of a fight. They require serious mental preparation and dedicated physical training. If you can work your way through those obstacles, then yes, a knife might be a good addition to your self defense repertoire. If not, then carrying one with you is only a talisman. A beautiful talisman, perhaps, but one that contributes to your safety only in the same way that a special piece of jewelry does.

Previous article
Next articleHow to Correctly Use Doe In Heat
Ethan Smith is a seasoned marine veteran, professional blogger, witty and edgy writer, and an avid hunter. He spent a great deal of his childhood years around the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. Watching active hunters practise their craft initiated him into the world of hunting and rubrics of outdoor life. He also honed his writing skills by sharing his outdoor experiences with fellow schoolmates through their high school’s magazine. Further along the way, the US Marine Corps got wind of his excellent combination of skills and sought to put them into good use by employing him as a combat correspondent. He now shares his income from this prestigious job with his wife and one kid. Read more >>