6.5 Creedmoor vs .243 Winchester: In Depth Comparison

Video 6.5 creedmoor recoil vs 243

Why Compare the 6.5 Creedmoor with the .243 Winchester?

The 6.5 Creedmoor is significantly more recent to the hunting scene than the.243 Winchester, which has a long history of use as a wonderful moderate recoiling deer hunting cartridge.

There are several notable variations between the 6.5 Creedmoor and 243 Winchester cartridges that you should be aware of, yet both offer certain advantages to hunters and there is some overlap in their capabilities.

However, there is a lot of hype and false information about these cartridges’ potential, particularly when it comes to the 6.5 Creedmoor. Although each cartridge has advantages for hunters, it’s still simple to become perplexed when attempting to determine what their true advantages and disadvantages are.

To help you decide which cartridge will work best for you, we have prepared an article today comparing the 6.5 Creedmoor and the 243 Winchester as well as their respective advantages and disadvantages.

6.5 Creedmoor History

The 6.5 Creedmoor has been around for a while, however the 6.5 Creedmoor is still largely unknown to most sportsmen. Nevertheless, not to the same extent as some of the more well-liked hunting and range rounds, some of which have been in the field for many years.

However, it has been around long enough for us to start completely comprehending both its strengths and its weaknesses.

In 2008, the 6.5 Creedmoor was introduced to the shooting community, filling the gap left by earlier 6mm rounds that required exceptionally high pressures to achieve the desired long-range performance.

The 6.5 Creedmoor’s design allowed for the employment of a long, thin bullet inside the casing without taking up space that could have been reserved for extra powder. More crucially, the 6.5 Creedmoor streamlined bullet would behave properly at great distances with little force applied, which is the desire of the precision shooter.

.243 Winchester History

The .243 Win has a significantly longer history than the 6.5 Creedmoor. The .243, also known as the “baby brother of the .308,” was first introduced to the shooting community in 1955. This cartridge offered a cartridge at the time that substantially filled a void in the hunting community.

With the help of lighter bullets better suited to target shooting and varmint hunting, this cartridge provided a long-range hunting round. Although it is a renowned deer killer and a great varmint round, as we shall see, these rounds are only appropriate for considerably shorter ranges. However, it demonstrates the versatile nature of. 243 Win.

The .243 round gained popularity in the United States and continues to do so today. It provided hunters with a very adaptable round that could be utilized in a number of hunting circumstances. The.243 Win can use a variety of bullet weights. These can weigh 55 to 115gr, but the majority of hunting cartridges have a weight limit of 100gr.

Additionally, the.243 Win has a rather illustrious history in the world of competition. The .243 better cartridge is still in use and is still used by some of the best marksmen in the world, even though newer cartridges are now the subject of much discussion and interest in the shooting community.

Basic Differences Between the 6.5 Creedmoor and .243

Both the 6.5 Creedmoor and the 243 Winchester have minimal recoil. One of the first calibres used for hunting has always been the.243 Winchester. Comparatively speaking, 6.5 is a newer version to compete with. Winchester 243 Some of their fundamental abilities overlap.

While picking one, there are a few glaring differences between them to take into account.

Criteria 243 Winchester 6.5 Creedmoor Range Shorter Longer Velocity Lower Higher Bullet Diameter .243” or 6mm .264” or 6.5mm Grain Weight 55-115 95-160 Energy Less More Recoil Less More Max Pressure 60,000 psi 62,000 psi Barrel Life 1500 rounds 3000 rounds

Specifications Difference between 6.5 Creedmoor vs .243

6.5 Creedmoor .243 Win Parent Casing .30 TC .308 Win Bullet Diameter 0.264″ 0.243″ Neck Diameter .2950″ 0.276″ Case Length 1.92″ 2.045″ Overall Length 2.825″ 2.7098″ Case Capacity 52.5gr 53-54.8gr Max Pressure (SAAMI) 62,000psi 60,000psi

These cartridge specifications reveal some intriguing parallels between the two. The 6.5 Creedmoorhas a slightly longer overall cartridge length than the.243 Win and accommodates slightly larger caliber bullets. Both can store about the same volume of powder.

The 6.5 Creedmoor differs from the .243 in that the bullet settles into the shell more shallowly. This is a significant benefit for a number of factors, and it’s another reason why many shooters who hand-load their brass particularly enjoy this cartridge. As opposed to most factory loads, it creates a significant amount of space in the casing for more powder.

See also  Getting Started Frog Hunting

Compared to the .243 Win, the 6.5 Creedmoor can withstand larger rounds. However, the size of the two cartridges are not too dissimilar. It will be fascinating to watch how these minor variations affect their performance ratings in the ballistic and other areas.

We will also briefly talk about the data we are looking at before going on. These are factory loads, and the performance information we’re looking at comes from reliable and accurate ballistic performance calculators and the manufacturer’s website. This is OK for comparing particular rounds, but it does not imply that the figures are unchangeable.

When compared to this data or another shooter, firing these rounds from your own platform might produce significantly slower velocities or different trajectories. It is a frequent occurrence, and the greatest source of comparison that will be constant from round to round is computer-generated data unless you have access to all of the cartridges, rifles chambered for them, and the tools to collect measurements. What we’re trying to communicate is that the performance variations observed here will also affect how well the identical weapons perform for you.

Does the 6.5 Creedmoor have better ballistics than the .243?

The ballistics are going to serve as the primary basis for comparison for anyone trying to choose between two cartridges. Understanding how a cartridge behaves after being fired is essential to consistently good shooting, regardless of whether you are selecting a cartridge for hunting or competing on the shooting range.

The velocity, ballistic coefficients, short- and long-range trajectory, and other ballistic categories will all be examined in this section when we compare the two cartridges. Later on in the comparison, these categories will assist us in determining which applications each cartridge is best suited for.


The bullet’s instantaneous gain in velocity as it leaves the muzzle is known as muzzle velocity. It is regarded as the primary criterion for determining a bullet’s velocity. Though the weights of various bullets vary, their velocities can be compared.

When comparing cartridges or simply knowing your round of choice, muzzle velocity is a crucial performance factor. Velocity is not a quality that stands independently from other classifications; rather, it has a significant impact on almost all of them.

Recoil, trajectory, and even the bullet’s stopping power are all influenced by it. You may learn a lot about the terminal ballistics just by looking at the bullet’s velocity and how well it maintains its speeds along its flight path.

The.243 rounds exhibit a substantially higher amount of velocity right out of the muzzle. Keep in mind that although the .243 rounds have relatively comparable powder charges to the 6.5 Creedmoor rounds, they use substantially lesser bullet weights.

You may have also noted that the muzzle velocity of the .243 rounds tends to drop down much more quickly than that of the 6.5 Creedmoor rounds.

For each cartridge, there are rounds with high and low velocities, but both have supersonic speeds at 500 yards. Compared to the, the 6.5 Creedmoor bullets typically hold their muzzle velocity better. By 300 yards, the 6.5 Creedmoortends to demonstrate similar or even higher muzzle velocity as the relatively lighter bullets after 243 rounds. 243 rounds.

Supersonic Limits

It is crucial for us to look at the average lengths of time that rounds of both the.243 and the 6.5 Creedmoor remain in supersonic flight because of the reputation of these two cartridges and their undeniable ability to win the confidence of long-range marksmen.

How long the round stays supersonic becomes important when you are shooting at targets that are 700 to 1,000 yards away. This is due to the fact that a bullet traveling at supersonic speeds and an upper and barrel that properly stabilize it will be more stable, making it simpler to modify shots and have a reasonable notion of where the bullet will land.

In comparison to the .243 Win, whose average range is just around 1,000 yards, the 6.5mm Creedmoor has a little more than 300 extra yards of supersonic flight.

There are a number of.243 Win rounds that surpass the 1,000-yard threshold, but the 6.5 Creedmoor has a distinct advantage in this area with several rounds in the 1,200+ yard range, with several falling into the 1,500 and 1,600 yard categories.

See also  Everyday Outdoors — Elk in the East

Ballistic Coefficient

Marksmen typically have one of two ideas about the BC: either it is an important figure that deserves careful consideration, or it is an unknown quantity that should be ignored. If you fall into the latter category, you ought to reevaluate how much importance you give your rounds’ ballistic coefficient.

The BC offers you an indication of how efficiently a bullet is streamlined in the most straightforward manner imaginable. The better a bullet can cut through the wind, the more effectively it can withstand drag and wind drift compared to a bullet with a lower BC.

Therefore, you might be seeking for a stronger BC for long-range shooting when wind might be more of an issue. A bullet with a high BC will help with long-range shots, even in hunting, where windy circumstances can occasionally be an issue.

The BCs of the 6.5 Creedmoor rounds are noticeably greater than those of the .243, with all of them exceeding a BC of .486 and two of them reaching astounding values of .697 and .719. Between .243 and .378 are the .243 rounds.

When examining these figures, you should also keep in mind that not all rounds are made with long-range shooting in mind. A BC of 0.5 is frequently not required. Sure, it’s nice to have, but the round will still work quite well with a 0.3 BC on some tasks.

We compared these figures to see whether there were any discrepancies or overlaps between the two cartridges, but ultimately, you should choose between individual rounds based on your shooting requirements.

Trajectory Difference between 6.5 Creedmoor and the .243 rounds

The trajectory of the two cartridges’ flight paths is often a contentious subject when comparing two cartridges. Although the.243’s performance is nothing to laugh at, the development of newer cartridges has reduced the.243’s usage in long-range shooting.

But it’s still crucial to consider how flat these two cartridges fire on the field. We’ll look at both the long-range and short-range trajectories in addition to the long-range one. Although the 6.5 Creedmoor is getting a chance in the hunting world thanks to more alternatives, the.243 is still a lot more popular hunting round.

Short Range Trajectory

There are some variances between the two cartridges at 200 yards, 100 yards after the zero setting. significantly lighter Even though all 243 rounds fall between the ranges of -4.6 and -1.4, there is nearly a 2″ reduction in bullet drop. more weight.

At this range, 243 hunting bullets resemble 6.5 Creedmoor rounds far more than sub-60gr rounds. We’ll soon examine how these two cartridges compare when the lightweight is excluded. A factory load is 243.

The small weight bullet can be more vulnerable to wind and other environmental conditions than a heavier cartridge, despite the fact that its trajectory appears promising.

Long Range Trajectory

With factory loads, this range is approximately as far as you can get, however long-range precision shooters may be looking for information at longer ranges. It is much past the point in hunting when you should actually be shooting at prey.

Even though the two light .243 varmint rounds from Hornady have the flattest trajectory of the bunch, trajectory only accounts for a small portion of what makes a cartridge accurate.

All of the rounds—6.5 Creedmoor and .243 Win—are densely packed together within a 3-4″ window at the 300- and 400-yard marks, with no single round exhibiting a flatter trajectory than the others. There is a bit more separation and perhaps an additional inch of bullet drop for the.243 rounds compared to the 6.5 Creedmoor as the hunting bullets approach the 500-yard mark.

The remaining hunting bullets start to drop much more quickly at 600 yards, but the 6.5 Creedmoor rounds tend to stay within the 70-inch drop range. This same trend continues out to the 700-yard mark where the four rounds we just mentioned hang around the 110″ drop mark while the rest fall below the 130” mark.

Just to put up the two lightweight for comparison. The bullet drops for 243 rounds are 93 and 94′′ at 700 yards.

For each cartridge, we can observe that certain rounds have flatter trajectories than others. While the averages may suggest that the .243 has the flatter long-range trajectory, it is important to keep in mind that this is only the trajectory and does not reflect the accuracy of these rounds as a whole.

Even though the lightweight .243 rounds may have a flat trajectory, their little weight and poor BC may prevent them from being as useful at these ranges as a heavier 243 or.6.5 round with a better BC.

See also  Crossbow Bolt vs Arrow: Major Differences Explained

Recoil Energy difference between 6.5 Creedmoor and .243

Felt recoil is a category that does require examination, however we believe that most experienced hunters and marksmen are more focused on other areas of comparison than recoil. Recoil, however, can be intimidating for newbies to the sport and may influence their choice.

We’ll spend some time talking about it in the context of the 6.5 Creedmoor vs. .243 for this reason. We’ll start off by stating that there are many more cartridges than the two we’re discussing that have significantly more intense recoil. However, some people would be curious to see how these two compare to one another.

It has all been 6.5 Creedmoor up until this point, but things are about to change. The .243 Winchester is unmatched in terms of recoil. Because of this, it is very simple to control and prevent injuries. The majority of novice hunters choose this better cartridge for this reason.

The felt recoil produced by the.243 rounds is far less, as would be expected for rounds with lighter bullets and comparable powder loads. This attribute makes this cartridge one of the most popular ones for novice sportsmen to start out on since they barely surpass the 10 ft. lbs markers.

And a more seasoned shooter shouldn’t consider the.243’s feature to be below their level of proficiency. As long as the other performance specifications of the better cartridge allow you to do what is required in certain conditions, light recoil can be a big benefit in many circumstances.

The force with which the rifle kicks you back is known as recoil. The better for your priceless shoulder, therefore, the lower the number. 100 gr 243 Win has an 8.8 ft. lbs. at 8.7 fps recoil. Recoil for 6.5 Creedmoor is 13 ft.lbs. at 10 fps, in contrast.

This indicates a force increase of almost 50%. Even though the.243 bullets have less recoil than the 6.5 Creedmoor, most shooters can readily manage them both.

Does the .243 have less kinetic energy than 6.5 Creedmoor?

Kinetic energy is the sole characteristic of two cartridges that you can compare. It most significantly advances the primary goal of employing hunting ammunition. which is to effectively kill animals. After reaching 400 yards, the 243 Winchester’s muzzle energy dropped below 800 ft. lbs. This implies that a mule deer may not be hit by a gunshot after 400 yards.

The kinetic energy from the 120 gr 6.5 Creedmoor, allows it to continue to fly over the line after 700 yards. Consequently, it has a wider field of influence than its rival. This demonstrates that 6.5 Creedmoor has a wider range overall.

The.243 Winchester will also kill with greater certainty at ranges beyond 300 yards. As a result, it is the better option out of the two in this area.

6.5 Creedmoor vs .243 – Barrel Life

The amount of rounds a barrel can fire without losing accuracy is known as the barrel life. 1,500 rounds are typically fired into a.243 Winchester barrel. The barrel life of the 6.5 Creedmoor is 3,000 rounds. It implies that the 6.5 Creedmoor can shoot twice as many bullets.

While the barrel life may not be an important factor to most, it may become a problem for those who tend to shoot a lot.

Is The 6.5 Creedmoor Better?

Do you typically hunt medium-sized game within 200 yards, such as whitetail deer, feral hogs, or black bears? If you put in the effort, both the .243 Winchester and the 6.5 Creedmoor are excellent deer hunting rounds, and there isn’t much of a ballistic difference between them inside of 300 yards.

Both rounds will successfully take down medium-sized wildlife. Choose the .243 caliber if you want to hunt mainly large game, such as deer, or the 6.5 Creedmoor if you want something a little more adaptable.

Both the.243 Winchester and the 6.5 Creedmoor are superior rifle cartridges, yet they have very different advantages and disadvantages. Although there are some notable distinctions between them (6.5 Creedmoor vs. 243), they are both effective for a variety of hunting duties.

Get a solid hunting rifle chambered in the cartridge you believe best suits your needs, develop your shooting skills, and utilise premium bullets, and you’ll be prepared for the majority of hunting circumstances.

Previous articleHow to Buy a Target Compound Bow
Next article7 Best Tactical Pistols of 2024
Ethan Smith is a seasoned marine veteran, professional blogger, witty and edgy writer, and an avid hunter. He spent a great deal of his childhood years around the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. Watching active hunters practise their craft initiated him into the world of hunting and rubrics of outdoor life. He also honed his writing skills by sharing his outdoor experiences with fellow schoolmates through their high school’s magazine. Further along the way, the US Marine Corps got wind of his excellent combination of skills and sought to put them into good use by employing him as a combat correspondent. He now shares his income from this prestigious job with his wife and one kid. Read more >>