A Complete Guide to Animal Tracks

0
66

Animal tracks are a key component to successfully watching, scouting, hunting, tracking, and photographing different wildlife species. If you want to know where the animals are, you often need to start by figuring out where they were, even if they aren’t there anymore. Sure, they may occasionally leave scat behind. (Brush up on your bear scat identification and deer scat identification just in case.) They might also scrape antlers, claws, or scent on nearby branches. But prints in the ground are the most reliable and ubiquitous bit of wildlife sign to look for.

While lessons in how to track deer and other game species benefit hunters, it’s also helpful to know how to track other species that we might not have tags for but would otherwise want to know the whereabouts of. If you see bear tracks on the ground, differentiating an old black bear track from a new grizzly track can be the difference between staying in a spot you should leave or turning around and avoiding a conflict.

Let’s dive into the wide world of animal tracks.

Animal Tracks: The Basics

Deer tracks walk through snow.
Start your tracking journey with an easy-to-recognize species, like these deer tracks.

Photograph by Cheaspeake Bay Program

Every good animal tracker must first start by being able to recognize animal tracks on the ground, certified tracking expert Kim Cabrera tells Outdoor Life. That doesn’t necessarily mean you know what animal it belongs to, and maybe you can’t discern a track anywhere other than fresh mud or wet sand. But if you can at least recognize the presence of an animal track and understand that it can tell you something, you’re off to a good start. Every other piece of tracking knowledge comes with repetition.

“It’s all a matter of practice, of looking at lots of tracks over time,” Cabrera says. “That’s pretty much how you learn. We call it ‘dirt time.’ You’re spending your dirt time looking at tracks.”

Cabrera suggests starting out by finding an animal track and trying to follow it for 20 consecutive steps. Local parks, sandy beaches, areas with fresh snow, or even light-colored cement sidewalks could work if you happen upon wet pawprints. This could be easy or hard depending on where you are. You could probably follow a domestic dog on a beach for twice as long, if not longer. But how long can you follow a deer track through dense woods in light snow on a windy day?

When the clear impressions in mud turn into messy grass or leaf litter, look for a pattern of depressions in the ground — even if they don’t look like obvious cloven hooves or pawprints. See if you can spot crushed or even bruised vegetation, mud spattered on otherwise clean leaves, or broken sticks, Cabrera says. Remember: Some critter made that mark. It’s your job to figure out what kind, and why.

Additional information about your location is also necessary for identifying animal tracks. For example, knowing which bear species do and do not exist in your area can save you a lot of time in trying to figure out if you’re looking at a black bear or grizzly bear track.

What Animal Tracks Can Tell You

The next step beyond being able to recognize a track on the ground is analyzing the track for information. If you read a good example of an animal track properly, you can learn:

  • What animal made the track
  • What size the animal was
  • What direction the animal headed in
  • How long ago the animal made the track
  • What pace the animal was moving at
  • Whether the animal was alone or accompanied by others

Look for how crisp the edges of the track are. Has moisture or debris accumulated in the depression? Did wind or rain soften the edges of the track? These characteristics can indicate how long the track has been exposed to the elements. Think about seeing your own footprints in sand or boot tracks in snow. If you go back to the same place a few days later, what do they look like? Certainly they’ve changed since you left them behind.

Aging Animal Tracks

Old bear tracks have frost particles in them.
If tracks have accumulated debris, lost their crisp edges, or even frosted over like these ones, they might be on the older side.

Photograph by Gila National Forest

Determining how old a print is can be difficult, but also extremely useful to trackers. As Cabrera points out, the age of the track will help a tracker figure out if the trail is worth following or not. If the prints are a few days old, the likelihood of seeing the animal that made them is pretty low. But if they’re fresh, they’re more worth following.

To figure out how old a track is, first assess the edges. Are they crisp and defined? Is the soil or sand moist or more dried out? What about the soil inside the track? Is it a lighter color than the soil beneath it, or is it still dark? Then, think back on the weather over the last few days.

See also  PVC vs. Rubber Air Hose: What's the Difference?

“When was the last rain, or snow, or wind event?” Cabera asks. “Tracks accumulate debris as they age.”

If the edges are crisp, the exposed dirt is still somewhat dark, and the track doesn’t hold pine needles or leaf litter or other debris, keep chasing it — you might find the critter that left it behind. Otherwise, make note of where you found it and maybe check back in a few days for fresher tracks.

Best Surfaces for Tracking

The surfaces where animals walk, also known as “substrate” in the experienced animal tracking world, vary in terms of how well tracks show up on them. Keep this in mind when you’re first starting out. Don’t go to a dry, hard-packed dirt or gravel trail if you want to find animal tracks. Instead, find a place that’s notoriously muddy. If it’s wintertime, wait for some snow to accumulate on the ground and go out as soon as it stops falling. If you live near a beach, dune, or other sandy area, try looking there first. Mud, snow, and sand are great substrates to track in because they’re soft and forgiving, which means animal tracks will be more visible.

Animal Tracks: Big Game Animals

All of these species are ungulates with cloven hooves that make symmetrical, heart-shaped tracks. They can be difficult to tell apart, especially in places where deer and pronghorn or moose and elk habitat overlap. Size and general habitat can help you distinguish them. Small cloven hooves on grassy flats in the prairie are likely pronghorn, while big hooves on a south-facing slope in the mountains are probably elk. Here are some of the most popular big game ungulate tracks of North America.

These sizes were pulled from a variety of reliable resources, like state game agencies and tracking websites hosted by Cabrera and Evans. The measurement ranges are helpful guidelines but aren’t completely set in stone. Fawns always have smaller hooves than mature adults, for example.

Deer Tracks

A deer track is pressed into mud.
Deer tracks are heart-shaped with rounded outer edges.

Photograph by Nathan Allred / Adobe Stock

Deer tracks are heart-shaped cloven hooves with pointy, inward-turning tips that sometimes feature dewclaws, depending how deep the substrate is where the deer stepped.

Deer track dimensions: 1 ⅜ to 4 inches long, ⅞ to 2 ⅞ inches wide

Elk Tracks

An elk track is printed in dirt with a ruler.
Elk tracks are larger than deer tracks.

Photograph by Cody Stricker

Elk tracks are wider, bigger, and slightly more rounded than deer tracks. Their dewclaws are higher on their legs and are less likely to show up than a deer’s dewclaws.

Elk track dimensions: 3 to 5 inches long, 2 ½ to 4 ½ inches wide

Moose Tracks

A man puts his hand next to a moose track in sand.
Moose tracks are significantly bigger than deer tracks and are more narrow than elk tracks.

Photograph by Benoit Renaud

Moose tracks are more elongated and pointy than elk tracks. They look more like giant, heart-shaped deer tracks, whereas elk tracks are more round.

Moose track dimensions: 4 ½ to 7 inches long, 3 ¾ to 6 inches wide

Pronghorn Tracks

A pronghorn track looks small compared to a human hand.
This pronghorn track is small, but it shows the straight, slightly concave outer edge that distinguishes it from a deer track.

Photograph by Bobby McCabe

Pronghorn tracks are roughly the same size as deer tracks, but the outer edge of their tracks are usually straight or even curve slightly inward, rather than curving outward in the classic heart shape of a deer track. Pronghorn also lack dewclaws.

Pronghorn track dimensions: 2 ⅛ to 3 ½ inches long, 1 ½ to 2 ¼ inches wide

Bighorn Sheep Tracks

A man
Bighorn sheep tracks are smaller and lack super pointy tips.

Photograph by Bobby McCabe

Bighorn sheep tracks, similar to pronghorn tracks, aren’t as curved on the outside and are more straight. They’re also blunter and less pointy at the tips.

Bighorn sheep track dimensions: 2 ⅛ to 3 ⅜ inches long, 1 ½ to 3 inches wide

Mountain Goat Tracks

A mountain goat track in rocky terrain.
This track is pretty faint, but with an animal as elusive as a mountain goat, trackers have to take what they can get.

Photograph by Chloe and Trevor Van Loon

Mountain goat tracks are more rectangular than heart-shaped, with the hooves facing straight ahead in a similar fashion to bighorn sheep. The interior space between their hooves creates a “V” shape.

Mountain goat track dimensions: 3 to 4 inches long, 2 to 3 inches wide

Animal Tracks: Bears

Bear tracks are known for the major differences between their front and hind tracks. Their front tracks are more fragmented and some space might exist between their pads and heels, while their hind tracks create a single solid shape. Hind bear tracks also tend to be significantly bigger than front tracks.

Location matters when determining what kind of bear tracks you’re looking at. Grizzly bear range and polar bear range are both pretty limited to small pockets of the West and Alaska respectively, so if you’re in the Southeast and see a bear track, you can assume with near certainty that it belongs to a black bear.

See also  Is It OK to Eat Bass?

Black Bear Tracks

A black bear track shows up in snow.
Black bear tracks are distinguishable from grizzly bear tracks by the alignment of their toes.

Photograph by Mark Apgar

The age-old way to tell a black bear track from a grizzly bear track is by imagining a horizontal line along the bottom of the five toes on a front track. If the outermost toe lands below that line, the track was likely made by a black bear.

Black bear track dimensions: 4 to 6 3/10 inches long, 3 ⅘ to 5 ½ inches wide (front tracks), 6 to 7 inches long, 3 ½ to 5 ½ inches wide (hind tracks)

Grizzly Bear Tracks

A hand scales a grizzly bear track in the mud.
Grizzly bear tracks are larger than black bear tracks, and have straighter toes.

Photography by Chloe and Trevor van Loon

On the other hand, if you draw a horizontal line below a grizzly bear’s toes, they will all fall on top of that line rather than dipping below it. Grizzly bear tracks are also significantly bigger than black bear tracks.

Grizzly bear track dimensions: 7 inches long, 5 inches wide (front tracks), 11 inches long, 6 inches wide (hind tracks)

Polar Bear Tracks

Two polar bear tracks are much larger than the hand next to them.
Polar bear tracks are the largest of all.

Photograph by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

The best way to tell if you’re looking at a polar bear track is to determine if you’re in polar bear range. Only small portions of northeastern Alaska and Canada are home to both grizzlies and polar bears, so if you’re studying a track in the mud in one of these areas, look to see if fur marks are visible. Polar bears have fur on the bottoms of their paws. Size is also a good indicator; polar bear tracks are absolutely massive.

Polar bear track dimensions: 5 ¾ inches long, 9 inches wide (front tracks), 13 inches long, 9 inches wide (hind tracks)

Animal Tracks: Furbearers and Small Game

These tracks all look more varied and unique than different species of ungulate or bear tracks do. Squirrel tracks and fox tracks, for example, look nothing alike. But one thing they all have in common is their relatively small size.

Squirrel Tracks

A set of squirrel tracks show up in fresh snow.
Squirrel tracks often show up in a bounding pattern.

Photograph by Alicia Penney

Squirrel tracks are small and often seen in bounding groups of four, similar to rabbit tracks. They have five visible toes and small pads on their hind tracks and four visible toes on their front tracks. The front tracks are longer and more oval-shaped while their hind tracks are rounder.

Squirrel track dimensions: 1 ¼ to 1 ⅞ inches long, ¾ to 1 ¾ inches wide

Raccoon Tracks

Raccoon tracks look like hands in mud.
Raccoon tracks sometimes replicate human hands with small claws.

Photograph by Don Loarie

Raccoon tracks almost resemble tiny hands. Their front tracks have small pads, long fingers, and they might show tiny claws. Their hind tracks have larger, longer pads with five fingers and claws.

Raccoon track dimensions: 1 9/16 to 3 ⅛ inches long, 1 9/16 to 2 ⅞ inches wide (front tracks), 1 15/16 to 4 inches long, 1 7/16 to 2 15/16 inches wide (hind tracks)

Fox Tracks

Red fox tracks show up in mud.
Fox tracks feature small ridges in their heel pads.

Photograph by Mark Apgar

Fox tracks look similar to coyote tracks, except they’re smaller and all the fur around their toes makes the tracks less crisp and more fuzzy. They also have a unique callous on their hind pads that makes a tiny, horizontal ridge, almost in a chevron shape, Cabrera says.

Fox track dimensions: 1 ⅘ inches long, 1 ½ inches wide

Beaver Tracks

Beaver tracks amble toward water.
Beaver tracks are usually visible near the swampy areas they inhabit.

Photograph by Justin / iNaturalist

Beaver tracks are distinct for their large, webbed hind feet and their hand-shaped front feet with five fingers, similar to those of raccoons.

Beaver track dimensions: 2 ½ to 3 ¾ inches long, 2 ¼ to 3 ½ inches wide (front tracks), 4 ¾ to 7 inches long, 3 ¼ to 5 ¼ inches wide (hind tracks)

Animal Tracks: Predators

Most predators in North America, aside from bears, are split into either canines or felines. Telling a wolf track or a coyote track from a domestic dog track can be difficult, as can telling a house cat track from that of a mountain lion kitten.

The primary difference between canine and feline tracks are the heel pads. Felines have distinct three-lobed heel pads that create an M shape, while canine tracks have two-lobed heel pads. Canine tracks are more elongated while feline tracks are wider. Lastly, if big claws are visible, it’s likely a canine, since felines have retractable claws that rarely show up unless they’re pouncing on prey or running.

Wolf Tracks

Wolf tracks dwarf domestic dog tracks in the snow.
The wolf tracks in this photo are shockingly huge compared to the human foot.

Photograph by Erin McKittrick

Adult wolf tracks are large, elongated canine tracks that outsize almost any domestic dog track. Look for little space between toe pads and worn claw marks.

Wolf track dimensions: 3 ½ to 4 ½ inches long, 3 to 4 ½ inches wide

Coyote Tracks

A coyote track is imprinted in mud next to a ruler.
Coyote tracks are long and narrower than domestic dog tracks.

Photograph by Cody Stricker

Coyote tracks are a smaller version of wolf tracks. They have the same narrow width and worn claws.

Coyote track dimensions: 2 ¼ to 2 ¾ inches long, 1 ¾ to 2 ⅜ inches wide

Domestic Dog Tracks

A domestic dog track shows up on wet sand.
Domestic dog tracks are wider, usually with distinct claws in soft substrate.

Photograph by Cody Stricker

Domestic dog tracks vary depending on the species in mind. But most domestic dog tracks are smaller than wolf tracks. They might have more defined claws from long periods spent indoors, and the overall shape of the track is usually a little wider and not as elongated as a wolf or coyote track.

See also  How to Go Salmon Fishing: An Angler's Guide for 2024

Domestic dog track dimensions: Variable size by species, but less than 3 ½ inches long

Bobcat Tracks

Two bobcat tracks show in soft sand with a notebook for scale.
Bobcat tracks look like a slightly larger version of domestic cat tracks.

Photograph by Zack Abbey

Bobcat tracks have a classic feline look, with three-lobed heel pads and four toes without distinguishable claws. They’re smaller than mountain lion and lynx tracks, but larger than common house cat tracks.

Bobcat track dimensions: 1 ¾ inches long, 1 ⅞ inches wide

Mountain Lion Tracks

A mountain lion track is distinct in wet clay next to a ruler.
Mountain lion tracks are marked by one leading toe and a three-pronged heel pad.

Photograph by Henrik Kibak

Mountain lion tracks are large and crisp. Unlike lynx, mountain lions don’t have long fur around their paws, so the tracks will be quite distinct. Look for uneven front toes — if it’s a right paw, the front left pad will poke out in front slightly, similar to a human middle finger (if you think of our thumbs as dewclaw, of course.)

Mountain lion track dimensions: 2 ⅕ to 4 ⅕ inches long, 1 ⅗ to 4 ⅓ inches wide

Lynx Tracks

A set of lynx tracks walk through snow with a glove for scale.
Lynx tracks are often blurry in soft substrate due to their furry paws.

Photograph by Norma Malinowski

Lynx tracks are round, big, and sloppy on the edges. If you’re tracking in snow, look for drag marks left behind by the long fur on their paws.

Lynx track dimensions: 3 ¾ inches long, 3 ⅜ inches wide

Common House Cat Tracks

Two domestic cat tracks show up on steps near a home.
Domestic cat tracks are small and distinguishable by their three-pronged heel pads, like mountain lions and other felines.

Photograph by Alicia Penney

Common house cat tracks will display as classic feline tracks with three-lobed heel pads, small or nonexistent claw marks, and a round overall shape. They’ll be smaller than bobcat tracks and might show some fur in and around the track, depending on what species left them behind.

Common house cat track dimensions: 1 ½ inches long, 1 ⅜ inches wide

Animal Tracks: Game Birds

Tracking game birds in harder substrate can be tricky since their light bodies don’t leave huge impressions in the ground. But bigger-bodied birds like turkeys leave more of a trail, and if you’re hunting in snow, mud, or wet, sandy soil, it shouldn’t be too hard to pick up on some game bird tracks.

A fun tip for tracking game birds: Most species have extremely small or entirely absent rear-facing toes, unlike anisodactyl “classic” tracks that show a long backward-facing toe for perching on branches. (This toe is called a “hallux.”) If you see a bird track on the ground with an equally long hallux, it’s probably not the game bird you’re looking for.

Turkey Tracks

A hat marks some wild turkey tracks in light dirt.
Turkey tracks sometimes show a small, rear-facing fourth toe, called a hallux.

Photograph by Aaron Allen

Turkey tracks have three outward-facing toes with a small or nonexistent hallux. They’re some of the biggest game bird tracks you’ll see.

Turkey track dimensions: 3 ½ to 4 ½ inches long

Quail Tracks

A set of quail tracks show up in sand.
Quail tracks are smaller than turkey tracks but have a similar shape.

Photograph by Garth Harwood

Quail tracks are smaller than turkey tracks and have a very small hallux that shoots off to the interior side of the track.

Quail track dimensions: 1 ⅖ to 2 inches long

Grouse Tracks

A trail of grouse tracks march through snow.
Grouse tracks walk in a single-file line through a light, dusty snow.

Photograph by Alicia Penney

Grouse tracks are extremely similar to quail tracks, except grouse are bigger and generally heavier than quail. Telling the two apart by their tracks alone is quite difficult.

Grouse track dimensions: 1 ⅖ to 2 inches long

Pheasant Tracks

Pheasant tracks are scattered across snow.
Pheasant tracks look very similar to grouse tracks.

Photograph by Walter Baxter

Pheasant tracks also look quite similar to grouse and quail tracks, but slightly bigger. They’re not as big as turkey tracks, though.

Pheasant track dimensions: 2 to 3 inches long

Resources for Trackers

There is a groundswell of information out there for interested animal trackers of all ability levels, certified expert tracker and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department non-game wildlife biologist Jonah Evans tells Outdoor Life. His suggestions range from in-person courses to guidebooks and smartphone apps, like the one he created, iTrack Wildlife.

“Take one of our tracking certifications. In a weekend, you’re exposed to a huge breadth of information about wildlife tracks and sign, and that will leapfrog a person forward dramatically,” he says, referring to certification courses put on by CyberTracker North America. “Or, if you want to start learning on your own, start with the most common species in your area. Domestic dogs, house cats, deer, rabbits, species that are super common, start looking for those and pay attention to them. Start with easy species you’re going to see a lot … and field guides are fantastic. Mark Elbroch’s field guide is sort of the Bible of animal tracks.”

Cabrera agrees on the value of Elbroch’s field guide to any animal tracker in North America.

Gear for Tracking Animals

While the best tools for tracking animals consist of a sharp eye and identification knowledge, there are a few pieces of gear that can make tracking easier on beginners. (This is especially true if you have a dog in tow. Read up on the best dog GPS trackers in case you have a pup with a tendency to dart off chasing a scent.)

  • Ruler
  • Camera
  • Item for scale (coin, dollar bill)
  • Mirror
  • Flashlight
  • Magnifying glass
  • Sketchbook and pencil
  • Tape measure
  • Tracking guide or smartphone app

Animal Track FAQs

Final Thoughts on Animal Tracks

Every animal that walks across a landscape leaves tracks behind. Knowing how to find and interpret those animal tracks is one of the best ways to see wildlife, whether you’re on a deer hunt or trying to round out your wildlife photography portfolio. So grab a small ruler, a camera, and maybe a guidebook, and go log some “dirt time.”

Previous articleBest Bow Sight Reviews
Next articleAugAnchor: Sand Bar Auger Anchor
Ethan Smith is a seasoned marine veteran, professional blogger, witty and edgy writer, and an avid hunter. He spent a great deal of his childhood years around the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest in Arizona. Watching active hunters practise their craft initiated him into the world of hunting and rubrics of outdoor life. He also honed his writing skills by sharing his outdoor experiences with fellow schoolmates through their high school’s magazine. Further along the way, the US Marine Corps got wind of his excellent combination of skills and sought to put them into good use by employing him as a combat correspondent. He now shares his income from this prestigious job with his wife and one kid. Read more >>